Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Our Newest Op Ed
Liberalism's Ultimate Goal: The Destruction of Christianity Through Social Security
- By Justin Darr
Would you let you child go fishing alone with a known child molester? Why not? The answer is simple enough: because patterns of behavior are called "patterns of behavior" for a reason, and once someone does something once, they are likely to do it again. Evil people do evil things over and over.
Over the last 50 years, the radical left has established a pattern of winning minor precedents from an activist judiciary system then slowly building on those precedents to warp the interpretation of the law and erode the fundamental foundations of our society.
The original Supreme Court decisions banning prayer and Bible reading from the public schools, for example, while controversial, raised little alarm from Christian churches at the time. In fact, the three chief cases that abolished school prayer; Engle v. Vitale (1962), Murray v. Curlett (1963), and Abington Township School District v. Schempp (1963), did not elicit a response from any Church to the Court during its deliberations. This is because people did not realize the destructive results these decisions would have on the public school system and our culture.
The rulings seemed relatively innocuous. Engle said schools could not have regency prayers, and Murray and Abington only said that teachers and school officials could not lead or require Bible reading in the classroom. Children could still pray whenever they wished and read their Bibles on their own during their free time. The original cases only restricted school officials, not the freedom of religion of the students themselves .............
Click HERE To Read On
- By Justin Darr
Would you let you child go fishing alone with a known child molester? Why not? The answer is simple enough: because patterns of behavior are called "patterns of behavior" for a reason, and once someone does something once, they are likely to do it again. Evil people do evil things over and over.
Over the last 50 years, the radical left has established a pattern of winning minor precedents from an activist judiciary system then slowly building on those precedents to warp the interpretation of the law and erode the fundamental foundations of our society.
The original Supreme Court decisions banning prayer and Bible reading from the public schools, for example, while controversial, raised little alarm from Christian churches at the time. In fact, the three chief cases that abolished school prayer; Engle v. Vitale (1962), Murray v. Curlett (1963), and Abington Township School District v. Schempp (1963), did not elicit a response from any Church to the Court during its deliberations. This is because people did not realize the destructive results these decisions would have on the public school system and our culture.
The rulings seemed relatively innocuous. Engle said schools could not have regency prayers, and Murray and Abington only said that teachers and school officials could not lead or require Bible reading in the classroom. Children could still pray whenever they wished and read their Bibles on their own during their free time. The original cases only restricted school officials, not the freedom of religion of the students themselves .............
Click HERE To Read On
# posted by Publius @ 6/22/2005 02:00:00 PM 
|
